Posts Tagged ‘petition’

"City of Medicated Drinking Water"

“City of Medicated Drinking Water”

If you wish to speak at City Council – You MUST register by July 15. 

Click Here to Register NOW!

JOIN THE FACEBOOK EVENT

On July 25, 2013 I will be appearing at the Durham City Council “Citizen Matters” period where I will formally appeal the Durham Public Health Board’s recent recommendation that the city continue drugging the public drinking water with a harmful neurotoxin called hydrofluorosilicic acid.

The board’s recommendation was made after the City government executed a coordinated plan to indoctrinate & bewilder the Durham Public Health Board on the basic realities of public water fluoridation; a plan that was hatched by the powers that be in response to my 2012 formal request for the evidence which substantiated the City of Durham’s fraudulent claim that adding hydrofluorosilicic acid to our drinking water somehow prevents tooth decay.  Unsurprisingly it has been 1.5 years since this request was made and the citizens of Durham have been presented with not a single such document.  Indeed I am convinced this is because no such documents exist or have ever existed,  as public water fluoridation is a complete fraud & crime against humanity that must stop immediately.

Instead, the citizens paid with their own tax dollars for a mock hearing this past March where only pro-fluoridationists that were or are currently affiliated with the government itself appeared. Their testimony presented a consortium of wholly unsubstantiated & fallacious opinions on why YOU should be forcibly medicated with a highly corrosive neurotoxin throughout your lifetime, leaving us still with no scientific evidence whatsoever that this practice is safe or effective –only carefully scripted hot air from the board of health!

This phenomenon is explored exhaustively in the retrospective documentary entitled “21st Century Dawes Project” which I highly recommend:

The key takeaway however is that this mock hearing was orchestrated for numerous reasons, the most important of all to create the illusion that the City were giving honest consideration to the evidence provided to them which shows clearly that ingestion of fluorides over time can lower your intelligence quotient, ossify your ligaments, calcify your arteries, and put you at risk to arthritis and other bone density disorders.

It was therefore lucid to this writer from the very beginning of this so-called “public debate” that the entire event was an utter fabrication by the city government, later made self evident by the fact that no public questions were allowed, not one critical question was ever asked during the hearing & the alleged ‘experts’ invited to testify could not even correctly identify in all of their disquisition what chemical is actually used to medicate the water supply! I thought how could this be when I did so easily by calling Water Management months earlier and retrieving their own documents that say exactly this?!

I concluded that the Government wouldn’t identify it as a part of the public hearing because doing so would expose the fact that they are using commercial grade toxic waste from the phosphate fertilizer & aluminum industries which is highly corrosive, toxic when consumed, and illegal to medicate our water with.

It should come as no surprise then that when I pointed this out to them, a sheriff deputy had me removed from the building:

The ironic fact is that the board of health’s self professed “due diligence” was based solely on the red herrings presented by a troupe of  clowns who thought they could mislead this writer and everyone else on the factual realities of fluoridation, a mistake that they will eventually pay for dearly.

That the Durham BOH recommended we continue drugging our drinking water in the face of the very serious facts presented to them only demonstrates their complicity and total negligence!  Since they have been made aware of the harm being done, it also demonstrates their active criminality by continuing the illegal behavior which has been pointed out to them.  It is for this reason that I will appear July 25th to inform these people that I see their lies, and will not stand for it!

Beyond this experience I have truly come to realize what we are up against when it comes to social change;  A government who has developed a compartmentalized system of interlocking bureaucracies that cooperate with each other in harmony with academia & propaganda, only  to maintain the dreaded status quo.  So one might ask why I continue to appear before an inherently corrupt system, one constructed only to perpetuate & congratulate itself, if we should not ever expect said system to respond rationally to our pleas?

I persist because even the inherently corrupt system is composed of inherently good human beings who individually must process the words spoken during public comment.  A timely and inspired speech that identifies an axiomatic truth which exposes the corruption will always and with great prejudice resonate on some level with the souls in a dark system who yearn for the light of understanding.

Over time, persistence in this way will eventually change the hearts and minds of those individuals and when enough do – the collective consciousness will shift to embrace the new, enlightened perspective instead of repeating the old tired propaganda of times past.

But if those who know the truth do nothing, what will happen?  The status quo will be maintained, or worse…expanded.

What does the status quo mean for you and your family?

If we do not act immediately, your family can look forward to a future where the few decide to help you help yourself  by pouring medicine into your drinking water that they, a comparatively small group of nobodies, decide are good for you. Of course you have no choice in this matter since government makes it abundantly clear you are wholly incapable of taking care of your own health.  In addition to being a crime, fluoridation has already been proven a disastrous experiment in socialized medicine that is deleterious to everyone’s health and undoubtedly one of the most significant medicinal frauds of the last 100 years.

If we continue to allow this government bureaucracy decide for us what medicines we take, through our public drinking water no less, then we leave ourselves open to infinite usurpation of our freedom since we have already surrendered the most sacred thing, our very own bodies,  to the onion of deception & subversion known as corporate government.  One only has to use their imagination to understand where our out-of-control government may take us next, if they already have adopted the role of healthcare providers by standing over our drinking water and dumping ‘medicine’ into it without our consent.  To illustrate this point please read the following New York Times article which optimistically considers the prospect of municipalities adding LITHIUM to the water supply as a means to mitigate “mood swings.”

If you find these crimes offensive in any way, then please consider joining me July 25, 2013 at the Durham City Council to appeal the fallacious statement that the city have reviewed all the evidence and deem water fluoridation a “safe and effective” policy to be continued in perpetuity.

If you wish to speak at City Council – You MUST register by July 15.

Click Here to Register NOW!

JOIN THE FACEBOOK EVENT

July 25, 2013 @ 1:00 PM:

Advertisements

May 21, 2013 – Fluoride Action Network Press Release

Clean Water Portland

Portland, Oregon — A broad coalition of Portlanders have resoundingly rejected adding fluoridation chemicals to the city’s water supply.  By a 61%  to 39% margin, Portland voters agreed with the positon of most western nations that there are safer, more effective, and less intrusive ways to promote oral health than adding a chemical linked to thyroid disease, IQ loss, and other ailments to the water supply.

“We are proud of our Portland colleagues who used science and integrity to defeat fluoridation and the public relations blitzkrieg that backed it,” says Paul Connett, PhD, FAN’s Executive Director.

Portland’s clean water campaign was spearheaded by Clean Water Portland (CWP), a broad coalition formed in August 2012 after a newspaper revealed secret ongoing fluoridation meetings with Portland City Council members that were illegally kept off the record. With virtually no public input, the City Council mandated fluoridation for the city on September 12. CWP then led an unprecedented effort that gathered over 40,000 signatures in less than 30 days to halt the mandate and force the referendum vote.

Clean Water Portland – Photo by Mark Colman

Fluoride chemicals are the only chemicals added to public water for the purpose of medication. Most western countries, including the vast majority of Europe, do not fluoridate their water.

“Most of Portland’s media falsely reported that fluoridation promoters had science on their side and that opponents used emotion,” says Connett.

“Those opposed did their homework, relying on recent scientific findings from the National Research Council (NRC) and Harvard that raise serious questions about the safety of current fluoride exposures.”

In 2006, the NRC warned that current fluoride exposures in the US may increase the risk of thyroid disease, endocrine disruption, neurological disorders, and bone damage – particularly among people who have medical conditions that increase their vulnerability to fluoride.  The NRC called on scientists to investigate fluoride’s role in chronic disease, but government health authorities have opted against funding this research.

Photo by Mark Colman

Portland’s vote comes just six months after voters in Wichita, Kansas soundly rejected fluoridation by a 20% margin, and follows close on the heels of an announcement this April that Israel will be ending its mandatory fluoridation program. In Ireland, legislation was proposed this spring that would make it a criminal offense to add fluoride to public water supplies, and in Canada, the number of people drinking fluoridated water has dropped by about 25% since 2008.

“The 21st century does not take well to anachronistic medical practices, and fluoridation is no exception.  This is why more than 120 communities have rejected fluoridation over the past 3 years alone,” says FAN’s Campaign Director, Stuart Cooper. “The trend is towards less fluoridation, not more.”

Photo by Mark Colman

In Portland, opposition to fluoridation included the regional Sierra Club, the Portland branch of the NAACP, Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality employees union, and more than 200 local medical professionals. National leaders also weighed in, including Ralph Nader, Lois Gibbs, John Stauber, Food and Water Watch, Organic Consumers Association, and esteemed scientists Drs. Theo Colborn, William Hirzy and two members of the NRC’s review.

cliff_walkerThe breadth of the coalition was reflected in polling data showing bipartisan opposition to fluoridation among democrats, republicans, and independents alike, and overwhelming opposition among communities of color.

Voters who rejected fluoridation were concerned by research showing low-income communities to be at highest risk of fluoride’s adverse effects with virtualy no offsetting benefit. This fact was not lost on Portland’s low-income neighborhoods, which voted overwhelmingly against fluoridation.

Fluoridation proponents had a massive war chest, raising almost $1 million. They used their nearly 4-to-1 funding advantage and media clout to flood Portland with misleading ads and editorials touting fluoridation as an urgently needed tool for solving the “dental crisis” in the city’s poor neighborhoods.

But there really wasn’t a dental crisis in Portland as the Oregon Department of Health’s own reports indicate. Fluoridationists tried to hide this inconvenient truth, pressuring state officials to not publicize new Smile Survey data showing Portland children’s decay rates have improved without fluoridation and, in fact, are better than most fluoridated cites.

“Fluoridationists had no evidence that any Portland child was fluoride-deficient; but did prove that some Portland children are dentist-deficient.  We urge the legalization of dental therapists in Oregon who will treat the low-income children who dentists refuse to treat,” says Connett.