Tyrone Pennsylvania To Remove Fluoride From Their Drinking Water This Spring

Posted: May 12, 2013 in city, council, dental, durham, fluoride, health
Tags: , , , , ,

Source: Altoona Mirror

TYRONE – Tyrone Borough residents will no longer have fluoride in their water, beginning later this spring.

Council voted 6-2 in a meeting last week to direct the Water Department to begin removing hydrofluorosilicic acid and its associated chemicals.

Concerns about fluoride have been raised recently, including from Water Department Superintendent Ardean Latchford, who said he’d been approached by several borough officials and concerned residents regarding fluoride.

Councilman Mark Kosoglow said he’d watched a documentary revealing fluoride to be a poison and wanted to see it removed from the water supply.

Mayor William Fink also said he’d spoken to some area professionals, including a funeral home director, and learned about the dangers of fluoride.

Council Vice President Christy Ray and councilwoman Courtney Rhoades voted against the motion, saying they wanted time to speak to a dentist before passing it.

“I hope your teeth fall out,” joked Ray to council members.

Interim Borough Manager Phyllis Garhart must post a 30-day notice informing borough residents, and then the fluoride removal can begin, Latchford said.

Tyrone Council is not the first local governing body to reject fluoride; the Altoona City Authority voted in 2007 to do the same, citing concerns about potentially negative health effects and a philosophical opposition to “mass medicating” the population.

Altoona Family Dentistry’s Dr. Katherine Dangler said despite what people may read on the Internet, fluoridated water is a good thing and she’s seen no scientific studies to prove otherwise.

Dangler said she also practiced in Bellefonte and State College, where the water is fluoridated, and said children in Altoona have more cavities because there is no fluoride to harden and strengthen tooth enamel.

While some opponents claim children will still be able to get fluoride from toothpaste or mouthwash, Dangler said, it isn’t going to be enough if it’s not in the water.

If fluoride is as dangerous as its critics believe, dentists and doctors wouldn’t back it, she said.

Latchford said Fink provided him with studies on fluoride, which noted that infants and young children are at risk for fluorosis, a medical condition resulting from overexposure to fluoride at a young age. The American Dental Association said fluorosis has mostly cosmetic effects usually resulting in white stains or streaks on the teeth.

The studies also showed that in children 8 and younger, whose teeth still are developing, high fluoride intake can pit tooth enamel.

Mothers may be mixing tap water with baby formula, Latchford said, unaware that they’re doing something wrong.

“If we take it out” they won’t have to worry, he said.

But Dangler said anything can be dangerous in excess, which is why it’s a dentist’s job to monitor patients and see what products are being used in the home. Not having more fluoride is more costly and has more negative consequences, she said.

Latchford said while he has no vested interest in the outcome, the fewer chemicals he has to add to the borough’s drinking supply, the better it will taste.

And while Latchford said saving money is not the reason for removing fluoride and its associated chemicals, it will result in $5,000 annual savings to the borough or roughly 91 cents per person.

Mirror Staff Writer Kelly Cernetich is at 946-7520.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. There are many studies by prominant, respected and peer reviewed people and organizations that discuss the strong connection between fluoride and endocrine problems, mental deficiencies and physical defects, fluorosis being the most prominent. The ADA and the government are in bed together. It costs a fortune to properly dispose of the highly toxic hydrofluorosilicic acid so they sell it to local communities as a cavity preventer, thereby avoiding the high cost of dumping it into a hazardous waste site, but also making money! What a scam. Whether or not you believe the tactics of the pro-fluoridarion groups, the fact of the matter is that is is against the law for the gov’t to add any medication or “nutritive” substance to the drinking water of the public. As a registered dental hygienist, I have seen the affects that too much fluoride can do to teeth. Although I received a wonderful education in dental hygiene school, I pride myself in thinking outside of the box and I research topics and words that are curious. Fluoride is a topic that needs much more examination. I, for one, want more investigation about a chemical, from a phophate fertilizer mine, put into my drinking water. I challenge you to look up fluoride on the internet.
    Pamela LeClair, RDH

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s